CatalogOpenAI Codex Plugins · OpenAI

canva-design-feedback

Read a Canva design and return structured, actionable design feedback — visual hierarchy, copy/messaging, layout & spacing, consistency, readability, and accessibility. Read-only; makes no changes to the design. Use when the user asks to "review my design", "give me feedback on this", "critique my deck/poster/flyer", "how can I improve this design", or "what's wrong with this slide".

AnalyzedOfficial7.5k stars

Savant verdict: Analyzed

Scanned or evaluated by Savant; not yet both passing.

Live evaluation

47overall
47quality
31compliance
54grounding
66actionability
49efficiency
Why this score may understate the skillThe live evaluation is a chat-only run: the model follows the skill's instructions but can't execute its scripts, call tools or reach the network.
  • Works with files or media (documents, images, designs) that the run can only describe in text.
Live telemetry from real runs (via the Savant skill router) replaces this estimate as it accumulates.

0 pass · 0 investigate · 7 fail across 7 cases. Jev accepted 7 of 14 LLM-drafted cases. Drafted and run by nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b, validated and scored by jev-latest.

  • Please critique this Instagram post design I made for our summer sale. Is the message clear and does it grab attention?positive case · fail
  • Review this workshop flyer I created. Does it communicate the essential info effectively?positive case · fail
  • Give me feedback on this design. It's for a client but I'm not sure what it's for.edge case · fail
  • Review this slide. The colors feel off but I can't say why.edge case · fail
  • Critique this design for accessibility. I used green and red to show pass/fail.edge case · fail
  • Edit this Canva design to make the title bigger and change the font to Helvetica Bold.negative case · fail
  • Tell me what stock photos to use in my Canva design to make it look more professional.negative case · fail

Safety (NVIDIA SkillSpector)

Risk score
0/100
Recommendation
SAFE
Severity
LOW
Savant decision
Passed
SkillSpector rated the package safe. SkillSpector 2.12.0, static analysis.

0 patterns found

Structure

  • No license declaredConfirm you may reuse this skill before importing it into your repository.

SKILL.md

---
name: canva-design-feedback
description: Read a Canva design and return structured, actionable design feedback — visual hierarchy, copy/messaging, layout & spacing, consistency, readability, and accessibility. Read-only; makes no changes to the design. Use when the user asks to "review my design", "give me feedback on this", "critique my deck/poster/flyer", "how can I improve this design", or "what's wrong with this slide".
---

# Get Design Feedback

Act as a design reviewer: read the design as it actually appears, then return concrete, prioritised feedback the user can act on. This skill is **read-only** — it never edits the design. When the user wants the changes made, hand off to `canva-edit-design` or `canva-implement-feedback`.

## What you can actually read (and the gap to know about)

- **`Canva:get-design-content`** returns text (`richtexts`) only — good for copy, headings, and wording, but it does NOT include colors, fonts, sizes, or element positions.
- **`Canva:get-design-thumbnail`** gives you the rendered image — this is how you "see" layout, hierarchy, balance, color, and contrast. Always pull this; visual critique depends on it.
- **Element positions, sizes, and text** are reliably available from a **read-only** editing transaction: `Canva:start-editing-transaction`, inspect the returned `richtexts`/`fills`, then `Canva:cancel-editing-transaction` (never commit — you are not changing anything). Use this for layout/spacing/alignment detail.
- **Colors and fonts are NOT reliably exposed.** Tested: the transaction payload often returns only text + position + dimension per element, with no color or font attributes. So treat the **thumbnail as the primary source** for any color, contrast, or typography judgement, and treat transaction style data as best-effort (use it when present, don't depend on it). Never report a specific hex/font as fact unless the payload actually contained it.

## Workflow

### Step 1: Resolve the design
Short link → `Canva:resolve-shortlink`; full URL → extract the ID; raw `D...` ID → use directly; otherwise ask.

### Step 2: Read the design
- `Canva:get-design` for title and page count.
- `Canva:get-design-thumbnail` (and/or `Canva:get-design-pages`) to see each page.
- `Canva:get-design-content` for the text.
- Optional (typography/color detail): read-only transaction as described above, then cancel it.

### Step 3: Evaluate across dimensions
Assess the design against these lenses. Skip any that don't apply to the design type:

- **Visual hierarchy** — does the eye land on the most important thing first? Title/subtitle/body contrast.
- **Layout & spacing** — alignment, balance, crowding, consistent margins/gutters.
- **Copy & messaging** — clarity, length, tone, typos, jargon, a single clear takeaway per page.
- **Consistency** — repeated fonts, sizes, colors, and spacing across pages.
- **Readability & contrast** — text size vs. viewing context, text-on-image legibility, color contrast.
- **Accessibility** — contrast ratios, alt text, text not conveyed by color alone.
- **Fit for purpose** — does it suit the stated channel/audience (a slide ≠ an Instagram post ≠ a flyer)?

### Step 4: Return structured feedback
Organise findings by **page**, each with a **severity** and a **concrete fix**:

```
## Feedback — "<design title>" (N pages)

### Top priorities
1. [High] Page 2 — Title competes with the body text (same size/weight).
   Fix: bump the title to ~1.5× and bold it so it reads first.
2. [High] Page 4 — White caption over a light photo is hard to read.
   Fix: darken the image or add a scrim; or move the caption to a solid band.

### Page-by-page
**Page 1** — [Med] Three different accent colors; pick one. [Low] "recieve" → "receive".
**Page 2** — ...

### What's working
- Consistent margins; strong cover image.
```

Use severities **High / Med / Low**. Lead with the few highest-impact items, then the per-page detail. Be specific and located (page + element), not generic ("make it pop").

### Step 5: Offer to act
End by offering to implement the API-fixable items via **`canva-edit-design`**, and note which items need manual work in Canva (e.g. font-family or background changes the API can't touch — see `canva-edit-design` for the full CANNOT list).

## Rules
- Never edit or commit anything — this skill is strictly read-only. If you open a transaction to inspect, always `cancel-editing-transaction`.
- Ground every point in something you actually observed in the thumbnail or content — no generic advice.
- Prioritise. A ranked shortlist beats an exhaustive list the user won't read.
- Be candid but constructive; always pair a problem with a specific fix.