Catalogskills.sh · composio-community

gh-address-comments

Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.

Review advisedVerified hub519 installs

Savant verdict: Review advised

Security analysis or source-hub review identified patterns requiring attention.

Live evaluation

Not evaluated yet. Workspaces can request a live evaluation.

Security assessment

Risk score
41/100
Recommendation
CAUTION
Severity
MEDIUM
Savant decision
Review advised
The assessment recommends caution with a risk score of 20/100 or more; review its findings before use. Static security analysis completed.

3 patterns found

  • analysis-evasion: scripts/fetch_comments.py (partial)high · SKILL.md:15 · Referenced artifact was not completely inspected
  • MCP Least Privilege: Skill declares no tool scope ('permissions' or 'allowed-tools') but code capabilities were detected: shell.medium · SKILL.md:1 · Without declared permissions the skill's intent is opaque and cannot be validated.
  • Dangerous Code Execution: subprocess.run(cmd, input=stdin, capture_output=True, text=True)medium · scripts/fetch_comments.py:96 · subprocess module calls execute external commands. Without careful input validation, this enables command injection.

Structure

  • Ships 1 executable scriptscripts/fetch_comments.py. Review what they do before enabling the skill for agents with tool access.
  • The source hub's security checks flagged this skillSnyk: fail (Risk: CRITICAL · 3 issues)

SKILL.md

---
name: gh-address-comments
description: Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.
metadata:
  short-description: Address comments in a GitHub PR review
---

# PR Comment Handler

Guide to find the open PR for the current branch and address its comments with gh CLI. Run all `gh` commands with elevated network access.

Prereq: ensure `gh` is authenticated (for example, run `gh auth login` once), then run `gh auth status` with escalated permissions (include workflow/repo scopes) so `gh` commands succeed. If sandboxing blocks `gh auth status`, rerun it with `sandbox_permissions=require_escalated`.

## 1) Inspect comments needing attention
- Run scripts/fetch_comments.py which will print out all the comments and review threads on the PR

## 2) Ask the user for clarification
- Number all the review threads and comments and provide a short summary of what would be required to apply a fix for it
- Ask the user which numbered comments should be addressed

## 3) If user chooses comments
- Apply fixes for the selected comments

Notes:
- If gh hits auth/rate issues mid-run, prompt the user to re-authenticate with `gh auth login`, then retry.