simplify-and-harden-ci
CI-only Simplify & Harden workflow for pull requests using gh-aw (GitHub Agentic Workflows). Runs headless scan-and-report checks for simplify/harden/document, posts structured findings, and can block merges on critical or advisory classes. Use when: you want automated quality/security review in CI without interactive approvals.
Savant verdict: Review advised
Security analysis or source-hub review identified patterns requiring attention.
Live evaluation
Not evaluated yet. Workspaces can request a live evaluation.
Security assessment
Scan pending.
Structure
- No license declaredConfirm you may reuse this skill before importing it into your repository.
- The source hub's security checks flagged this skillSocket: warn (1 alert: gptAnomaly); Snyk: warn (Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue); Runlayer: fail (2/2 files flagged)
SKILL.md
---
name: simplify-and-harden-ci
description: "CI-only Simplify & Harden workflow for pull requests using gh-aw (GitHub Agentic Workflows). Runs headless scan-and-report checks for simplify/harden/document, posts structured findings, and can block merges on critical or advisory classes. Use when: you want automated quality/security review in CI without interactive approvals."
---
# Simplify & Harden CI
## Install
```bash
gh skill install pskoett/pskoett-skills simplify-and-harden-ci
```
Fallback using the Agent Skills CLI:
```bash
npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-skills/skills/simplify-and-harden-ci
```
## Purpose
Run a CI-only variant of Simplify & Harden in pull requests:
- No code mutation in CI
- Review only changed files
- Emit structured findings
- Optionally block merge based on severity gates
Use `simplify-and-harden` for interactive/local coding sessions.
## Context Limitation (Important)
CI agents do **not** have the same peak implementation context as the coding
agent that wrote the change. Treat CI findings as structured review signals,
not as full intent-aware rewrites.
Implications:
- Prefer scan/report and merge gating
- Do not auto-apply code changes in CI
- Escalate ambiguous findings to interactive review
## Prerequisites
1. GitHub Actions enabled for the repository
2. GitHub CLI authenticated (`gh auth status`)
3. `gh-aw` installed locally for authoring/validation:
```bash
gh extension install github/gh-aw
```
4. In GitHub Actions jobs, install the CLI with:
```yaml
- uses: github/gh-aw/actions/setup-cli@main
with:
version: v0.2.0-beta
```
## CI Contract
The CI skill must enforce:
1. Scope lock: review only files changed in the PR
2. Headless execution: report findings, do not apply patches/refactors
3. Structured output: emit `simplify_and_harden` summary payload
4. Gate policy:
- `critical`: fail check when critical harden findings exist
- `advisory` (optional): fail check when advisory findings are configured to block
## Authoring Workflow (gh-aw)
Example-only template lives in `references/workflow-example.md`.
Keep it outside `.github/workflows` until you explicitly want automation enabled.
When ready to enable:
1. Copy `references/workflow-example.md` template block into `.github/workflows/simplify-and-harden-ci.md`. (The `.md` extension is intentional: gh-aw workflows are markdown files that `gh aw compile` compiles into the `.lock.yml` files GitHub Actions actually runs. This is not a standard hand-written Actions YAML workflow.)
2. Compile and validate workflow:
```bash
gh aw compile --validate --strict
```
3. Trigger and push workflow changes:
```bash
gh aw run simplify-and-harden-ci --push
```
4. Check status/logs in GitHub Actions and ensure PR feedback is posted.
## Prompt Template (CI)
Use this prompt body in your gh-aw workflow:
```text
Run Simplify & Harden in CI (headless mode) for this pull request.
Rules:
1) Review only files changed in this PR.
2) Do not modify repository files.
3) Before reporting findings, re-read all changed code with "fresh eyes" and actively look for obvious bugs, errors, confusing logic, brittle assumptions, naming issues, and missed hardening opportunities.
4) Simplify pass: detect dead code, naming clarity issues, control-flow complexity, unnecessary API surface, and over-abstraction.
5) Harden pass: detect input-validation gaps, injection vectors, auth/authz issues, secret exposure, data leaks, and concurrency risks.
6) Document pass: suggest non-obvious rationale comments as findings (do not edit files).
7) Emit structured YAML under key `simplify_and_harden`, including:
- simplify findings
- harden findings (critical/advisory split)
- summary counts
- `review_followup_required`
- learning loop candidates for self-improvement ingestion
8) If blocking policy is enabled and matching findings exist, mark the run as failed.
```
## Recommended Outputs
1. PR comment with concise findings and severity ordering
2. Check run summary with pass/fail reason
3. Machine-readable YAML artifact for downstream automation
## Integration with Self-Improvement
Forward `simplify_and_harden.learning_loop.candidates` into
`.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` via the `self-improvement` workflow so recurrent
patterns can be promoted into durable agent context rules.